rulururu

post SEO Myths

January 18th, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — vsloathe @ 6:04 pm

A happy Friday to all.

There is an absolute plethora of misinformation out there about SEO, so as my contribution to

the community, I’m going to dispell a few SEO myths.

There is no such thing as a sandbox. Yes, that is correct, there is no Google sandbox.

If your brand spanking new page is not immediately indexed, it’s because you don’t have

enough links, or Google has not updated its index to reflect your site’s inclusion yet.

I’ve had sites that were plastered with ads indexed within 2 hours, and I’ve had sites

white as the driven snow with 50 backlinks from trusted domains take ages to get indexed.

Which brings me to my next point: edu = gov = com = info = net = org = …

The TLD of a domain matters about as much as the color pants you’re wearing when you get a link from it. It’s *trust* that makes a good link, not its TLD.

Pagerank doesn’t matter either. It’s just an arbitrary standard produced by a company who has one and

only one ultimate goal - to make money. The only reason to ever worry about the pagerank of your pages

is so that you can sell links to suck..er…other webmasters who care about such things.

There is no duplicate content penalty! I cannot emphasize this enough. Google itself is just

a giant content scraper. There are millions of blogs and aggregators out there that just copy

other content. As long as you credit the source, you have nothing to worry about if your

content is not original. Just remember who the biggest content theif on the web is, and

that they made 10 billion dollars last year.

That’s all for now. Hope to catch you all later.

-V

5 Comments »

  1. […] post by vsloathe.com Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and […]

    Pingback by SEO Myths | Sell Domain — January 18, 2008 @ 7:22 pm

  2. […] Original post by vsloathe.com […]

    Pingback by My Domains » Blog Archive » SEO Myths — January 18, 2008 @ 7:39 pm

  3. HOLY SHIT! A real post!

    roflmao

    Nice one lad.

    /p

    Comment by perkiset — January 23, 2008 @ 2:16 am

  4. The “sandbox” as I understand it has nothing to do with getting indexed… it is to do with the ability of a new site to rank in the SERP for given terms.

    So, a “sandboxed” site can:

    Be be 100% indexed according to a “site:domain.com” search.
    Have better content than its competitors.
    Have better links than its compeititors.

    … and still not appear anywhere useful in the SERP…. until X time has passed when it is allowed to rank.

    Have you tested this theory in a competitive / heavily spammed areas like credit, payday loans, mobile phones, viagra etc… i.e. are you able to jump straight into the SERP in these niches in the way you can with niche sites???

    I can rank a “poodle training” site pretty quickly… but the over spammed niches I would say I my sites have been sandboxed.

    I have a new site which has been “sandboxed”. It is 100% indexed. It is WH. It has good backlinks and good content etc. It is better than 90% of the other sites in the SERP… my rank on my main target keyword:

    Yahoo #1
    Live # 11
    Google #120

    And it is absolutely stuck at #120… nothing will move it above that spot…

    Ref domains… supposedly hyphenated domains receive less “trust” from G…. so domains are indirectly relevant.

    Comment by Jez — August 26, 2008 @ 6:27 am

  5. I also had always thought that there is no duplicate content penalty.

    Comment by Kenney — August 29, 2008 @ 11:52 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

ruldrurd
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)